Topic: GOC attacked by convicted soldiers Fired!!!  (Read 1598 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GOC attacked by convicted soldiers Fired!!!
« on: September 17, 2014, 07:35:54 AM »
Military authorities have retired the former General Officer Commanding the 7 Division of the Nigerian Army, Maiduguri, Maj. Gen. Abubakar Mohammed.

Investigations by The PUNCH   revealed this on Tuesday just as the Nigeria Labour Congress, the Trade Union Congress and   human rights lawyers pleaded for the pardon of 12 soldiers who were sentenced to death by a military court on Monday.

The soldiers, who had on May 14, 2014 fired shots at Mohammed, in Maiduguri, were convicted for mutiny and other offences such as insubordination .

Investigations revealed that Mohammed was retired after he was recalled to the Headquarters of the Nigerian Army without posting for months after the soldiers’ attempt on his life.

It was gathered from a top military source in Abuja that the Army authorities quietly retired him last month.

The source said, “The Maj. Gen. has been retired; you don’t expect that to be made public; issues of retirement especially in the military are confidential. The man was at the Army headquarters for some time. He was awaiting posting then   but he was eventually retired about a month ago.”

Meanwhile, the NLC, TUC   and human rights lawyers have urged the Presidency and the Army Council chaired by the Minister of Defence to prevail on the military authorities to spare the lives of the 12 soldiers.

The lawyers are   three Senior Advocates of Nigeria–Olisa Agbakoba,     Femi Falana and   Sebastian Hon – as well as Fred Agbaje and Monday Ubani.

In fact, Agbakoba, who flayed the judgment threatened to go to court to seek justice for the convicts.

He said that the process through which the court martial passed the sentences on the soldiers   was unconstitutional.

The SAN, who maintained that the composition of the court   violated the principle of natural justice, said     he had asked his lawyers to approach the convicts for the purpose of lodging an appeal against the military authorities.

He said, “The court martial system is totally unconstitutional. They (soldiers) have the right to go to court and appeal the judgment. Actually, I have asked my lawyers to approach them and afford them our services to lodge an appeal.”

Agbakoba submitted that the offence for which the soldiers were tried and found guilty was undefined. He stated   that Section 38(12) of the 1999 Constitution stipulated that all offences must be defined.

He said,“I have represented a number of soldiers at court martial. In particular, I represented Gen. JOJ Okulagu and my point at the   court martial was that a process that allows the commander to appoint the investigator, the court martial president, members and the judge advocate is clearly contrary to all principles of natural justice.

“The basis of justice is that everybody who has the power to decide has a duty to act fairly. Without prejudice to the offence, whether the person is guilty or not, he is entitled to a fair trial.

“The Army Act that defines the work for the court martial system is unconstitutional because the basic offence contained in the Army Act is that you are charged for an offence said to be prejudicial to service discipline.

“That is what the law says–conduct prejudicial to service discipline. But conduct prejudicial to service discipline is an undefined offence contrary to Section 38(12) of the Constitution and the court has said that offences must be defined.”

Falana and Hon, who acknowledged the severity of the offences the soldiers were accused of, said pardoning them was necessary in view of the circumstances informing their action.

Falana said the soldiers were erroneously charged under S ection 52(1) of the Armed Forces Act Cap A 20 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 as Mohammed whose car was shot at by the soldiers was not killed.

“The soldiers were charged with attempted murder which does not attract death penalty. In the circumstance, the 12 convicts should have been charged under Section 52(2) of the Armed Forces Act which provides for life imprisonment,” he said.

The human rights lawyer called on the Army Council not to confirm the verdict but to commute it to imprisonment.

Source: Punch

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
3897 Views
Last post September 17, 2014, 09:06:50 AM
by flukky01
0 Replies
1839 Views
Last post February 26, 2015, 01:00:52 PM
by flukky-1
0 Replies
1193 Views
Last post December 25, 2015, 07:00:18 AM
by sahara
0 Replies
989 Views
Last post June 07, 2016, 07:00:25 AM
by olutee
0 Replies
971 Views
Last post December 24, 2016, 07:03:09 PM
by sahara
0 Replies
748 Views
Last post April 24, 2018, 01:03:16 PM
by betpredict
0 Replies
934 Views
Last post August 08, 2018, 01:07:03 AM
by NaijaPilot
0 Replies
1529 Views
Last post September 16, 2018, 01:03:55 AM
by clowntom
0 Replies
486 Views
Last post October 30, 2020, 01:00:42 PM
by sahara
0 Replies
153 Views
Last post January 31, 2023, 07:00:44 AM
by PulseNG